Distinguish Between Coercion and Undue Influence

Tue Apr 08 2025

If you wish to know about the distinguish between coercion and undue influence, then in the world of law, contracts play an important role in making sure that people in an agreement can trust its terms. But for a contract to be enforceable by law, the agreement must be voluntary, not under duress or manipulation. If there is pressure, duress, or manipulation in the contract, it can be voidable. Two important ideas tend to arise in such a situation: coercion and undue influence. But how do we differentiate between coercion and undue influence? Let's simplify it and see what these ideas are all about.

Table of Content

⚖️Difference Between Coercion and Undue Influence for More Understanding:

Particulars	Coercion	Undue Influence
Definition	Involves someone to act under threat or injury	Involves exploiting the power of position to manipulate someone to make a decision
Nature of Pressure	Physical harm or illegal actions	Psychological or emotional manipulation
Consent	The consent is obtained, not making it seem like a threat	Consent is affected by an imbalance of power or trust
Use of Force	Threat of force	Relies on manipulation
Example	Threatening to harm the family if the contract is not signed	Persuading an elderly person to make a will in their favour due to trust or dependency
Legality	Illegal and renders agreements	Can make agreements voidable if proven in court
Key Element	Threat of harm or illegal actions	Exploitation of trust or power

💼What is Coercion in Business Law?

Difference Between Coericon and Undue Influence.png

Coercion is the act of using force, threats, or intimidation to make a person do something. In the law of businesses, coercion is mostly the case when a party uses physical violence, threat of injury, or other types of intimidation to cause the other party to sign a contract. If coercion has occurred in a contract, then it means that the parties had not voluntarily entered into a deal.

📜What is Coercion in Contract Law?

Coercion in the context of contract law can be understood as putting someone under duress to sign a contract unwillingly with the use of threats, violence, or intimidation. It means applying wrongful pressure on someone to make them do something they would not do in a normal situation. For instance, if someone is coerced into signing a contract by threatening them with injury unless they do so, then such a contract would be invalid under the law because it was signed under duress.

The principle here is that the consent that is arrived at under coercion does not constitute free will. One party's will is not willing, since it is prompted by fear of injury or unjust pressure. The law in such circumstances safeguards the victim and can make the contract voidable.

⚖️Effect of Coercion

Coercion has serious legal consequences. A contract made under coercion is generally voidable. This implies that the victim of coercion has a right to rescind or terminate the contract and pursue legal redress.

The consequences of coercion are extensive as they violate the principle of free and informed consent in legal contracts. Coercion may have severe consequences like:

Rescission of the Contract: The victim can request the court to invalidate the contract, so that it appears as if the agreement never existed.
Damages: In certain cases, the victim is eligible for compensation for loss caused by the coercion.
Criminal Liability: In other cases, coercion can even entail criminal charges if there is physical harm or serious threats involved.

🧠What is Undue Influence?

Undue influence is where an individual employs their position of authority, trust, or power over another to control or manipulate their choices, usually without the use of physical threats. Unlike coercion, which is direct threats or force, undue influence is subtle and usually entails psychological pressure.

Undue influence can occur in personal or professional relationships where one party is in a superior position, like a parent-child, employer-employee, or caregiver-dependent relationship. The party with the superior position might use their leverage or superior position of authority to gain influence over the other party's decision-making.

📚Undue Influence in Contract Law

Undue influence is the situation under contract law when one party brings too much influence or pressure over another to such an extent that the influenced party does not have a free choice or make decisions on their own. This has usually been present in situations of relationships where a party is relatively more powerful and may unduly influence the other party's decision-making process.

👥Undue Influence Can Exist in the Following Relations

Undue influence can occur in all kinds of relationships, particularly where there is inequality of power. These are some typical examples:

Parent and Child: A parent might coerce a child into accepting a business choice or agreement that is not in the kid's interest.
Employer and Employee: An employer may utilize their power or control over an employee to pressurize them into signing an agreement or contract they are not satisfied with.
Guardian and Ward: A guardian can exploit their position to coerce a ward into a choice that is good for the guardian but not for the ward.
Doctor and Patient: A doctor would possibly utilize their power to sway a patient's choice, particularly where medical contracts or money is involved.
Financial Advisor and Client: A financial advisor may exercise undue influence over a client for making some financial decisions in a manner that is more beneficial to the advisor than the client.

💼What is Undue Influence in Business Law?

Undue influence in business law is the same as in contract law but is limited to the context of business. It occurs when a party in a business relationship takes advantage of their power or position to influence another party's decision. It may happen in any business deal where there is unequal distribution of power. For example, a powerful business partner may unfairly pressurize another partner into accepting terms that work to the superior partner's advantage.

Undue influence will impact the integrity of commercial transactions and potentially cause contracts that are voidable. This provides for the reasonableness of not allowing parties or companies to take advantage of other people simply because they hold greater power or influence.

⚖️Effects of Undue Influence

Undue influence also has important implications in both contract law and business law. Similar to coercion, contracts made under undue influence are usually voidable. The impact of undue influence can be observed as follows:

Rescission of the Contract: The influenced party can ask for cancellation of the contract and be returned to their original position.
Restitution: The influenced party may be entitled to restitution, which is the return of any benefits obtained under the contract.
Invalidation of Specific Transactions: If undue influence is established in a contract or business deal, it could result in the whole transaction being invalidated.

💡Essential Undue Influence

Undue influence is where an individual exercises their power, trust, or authority to cause another individual to make choices or enter into contracts that they would not otherwise have made. The defining characteristic of undue influence is that the free will of the victim is overcome by the superior party to the detriment of justice.

There have to be specific elements for there to be undue influence:

Exploitation of Power: The individual who exercises undue influence should be in a position of power, either psychological, financial, or social, that enables him to dominate the weaker party.
Vulnerability of the Influenced Party: The victim in undue influence must be vulnerable due to circumstances such as age, sickness, or dependency, thereby making them easier to manipulate.
Lack of Free Will: The affected party is coerced or convinced into taking decisions they would not have taken otherwise, which usually leads to contracts or actions that are against their best interest.

🎯Conclusion

In summary, both coercion and undue influence are pressures to make a decision, but in dissimilar manners. Coercion entails threats or force, wherein one is pressured to fear for injury unless he acquiesces, such as threatening someone to sign a contract. Undue influence, on the other hand, is when an individual takes advantage of their authority or control over another human being to control their decision without resorting to threats.

It is critical to recognize the distinction in legal cases, as contracts signed under coercion or undue influence can be invalid. If you are not sure about your rights or need assistance interpreting these notions, CollegeHai can provide you with answers. With expert advice and materials, CollegeHai guarantees informed choices, whether pursuing law studies or confronting such challenges.

❓Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

1. What is the difference between undue influence and misrepresentation?

Undue influence is where one uses his or her power or trust to get another to make a decision, while misrepresentation is where one gives out false information in order to mislead someone into a contract.

2. What is the difference between authority and coercion?

Authority is the legitimate right to make decisions, whereas coercion is threatening, forcing, or intimidating someone to do something against their will. Authority tends to be legal and rooted in position, whereas coercion negates free will by means of pressure or fear.

3. What is the difference between coercion and manipulation?

Coercion applies direct threats or physical pressure in order to have someone do something, whereas manipulation employs psychological moves to quietly push or manipulate one's choices. Coercion is more visible and forceful, while manipulation is more devious and mental.

4. What is the difference between coercion and exploitation?

Coercion means threatening or applying pressure on an individual into making a decision, whereas exploitation is taking disadvantage of someone's weaknesses or shortcomings. Coercion is exercising power through strength, whereas exploitation is gaining at the expense of another person's disadvantage.

5. Are coercion and undue influence always obvious or easily detectable?

No, undue influence and coercion are usually so subtle and in some cases psychologically manipulative and hard to distinguish, that unless the victim only realizes they've been coerced or influenced upon reflection after, it is rather hard to discover.

6. Can coercion and undue influence occur in various contexts?

Yes, both undue influence and coercion can happen in a range of settings, such as personal relationships, business deals, and legal contracts. Both ideas apply to any context where pressure or power is brought to bear to make someone decide something.

7. What are the ethical concerns associated with coercion and undue influence?

The moral issues are the infringement on free will and the justice of decision-making, since both coercion and undue influence take advantage of people's weaknesses. They destroy trust and justice in relationships, which results in pressured decisions instead of voluntary consent.

8. How can coercion and undue influence be identified?

Coercion and undue influence may be determined by searching for indications of pressure, threats, or manipulation during decision-making. Indications such as power imbalances, changes in behavior that occur suddenly, or unwillingness to make decisions independently may indicate that coercion or undue influence exists.

Like what you see? Share with a friend.